A authorized battle taking part in out in a northern Ontario courtroom this month has seen an alliance of First Nations argue they’re owed upwards of $100 billion for the Crown’s failure to honour a 173-year-old treaty promise, whereas the federal and provincial governments declare they’re both owed far much less, or nothing in any respect.
The case being heard in Thunder Bay, Ont., might have historic implications for First Nations representing roughly 15,000 Anishinaabe folks alongside the northern shores of Lake Superior and is being carefully adopted by authorized observers.
On the centre of the trial – which is presently listening to closing arguments – is what the First Nations argue is a damaged treaty promise that has resulted in a generations-long sentence to poverty whereas non-Indigenous communities thrived from the territory’s useful resource wealth.
“This case is about righting wrongs and, lastly, the federal government adhering to the treaties that had been in place, and the First Nations getting what they’re owed,” Chief Marcus Hardy of the Pink Rock First Nation, one of many Nations behind the declare, mentioned in an interview.
Anishinaabe leaders signed two treaties in 1850 overlaying territory alongside the northern shores of Lake Superior and Lake Huron, stretching from what’s now Thunder Bay south towards Parry Sound, Ont.
As a part of these agreements – often called the Robinson-Superior and Robinson-Huron treaties – the Crown promised an annuity to the Anishinaabe and included a novel clause to extend the annual cost as useful resource income permitted.
That annuity was first set at round $1.60 per capita, and has solely been elevated as soon as, to $4 in 1875. Now, the First Nations argue they’re owed billions.
Indigenous authorized specialists say the choice within the case might have an effect on different treaty negotiations.
“The ideas of sharing and useful resource profit sharing — they’re actually issues that we now have to speak about in what we name implementing historic treaties,” mentioned Sara Mainville, a former chief of the Couchiching First Nation and companion at JFK Legislation, whose apply areas embrace Indigenous self-government and treaty implementation.
Superior Court docket Justice Patricia Hennessy dominated in 2018, as a part of the primary stage of the case, that the Crown had an obligation to interact with the Anishinaabe in a course of to extend the annuities when financial circumstances permitted.
Earlier this 12 months, Canada and Ontario agreed to a separate proposed settlement that will, if ratified, see them every pay $5 billion to the 21 First Nations lined by the Robinson-Huron treaty.
However attorneys for the First Nations lined by the Robinson-Superior treaty say no cheap supply was made to their purchasers, resulting in the present case transferring forward.
These attorneys argue the First Nations are owed as much as $126 billion.
They are saying the decide listening to the case isn’t solely being requested to set out guideposts for learn how to decide what’s owed to the First Nations, but in addition doubtlessly groundbreaking rules for the way the treaty can be honoured sooner or later.
Hardy mentioned the choice might assist set the “constructing blocks with the intention to transfer forward” with the way forward for treaty relations and First Nations self-government.
“Though it is going to enrich our First Nations members’ lives – it is going to enrich our future generations’ lives – what’s extra necessary is the acknowledgment and following the treaty sooner or later,” he mentioned.
The decide’s resolution will weigh testimony about how a lot cash the Crown made in useful resource revenues over the previous 170 years, what sources to incorporate and what bills to subtract, what portion of these revenues had been to be shared with First Nations, learn how to calculate the rate of interest, and learn how to divvy up legal responsibility between Canada and Ontario.
“A court docket’s resolution on learn how to carry ahead the cash or learn how to calculate what’s truthful compensation for many years of losses goes to be influential in guiding negotiation tables throughout the nation,” mentioned Michael Coyle, a professor in Western College’s college of legislation who makes a speciality of treaty and Indigenous rights.
Legal professionals for Canada have argued in written submissions that the First Nations’ compensation declare depends on a mannequin that captures the overall worth of the territory’s useful resource wealth, above what the Crown earned immediately on these sources by way of levers resembling taxes.
They are saying that mannequin doesn’t mirror a “sensible shareable quantity” and counsel the compensation award ought to be within the vary of $578 million to $2.45 billion.
Legal professionals for Ontario, in the meantime, argue in written submissions that the First Nations are owed nothing, or at most $86 million, as a result of the Crown has spent extra money than it is made making an attempt to develop the sources within the space lined by the Robinson-Superior treaty.
That is a place that “defies reasonableness and logic,” argues Harley Schachter, a lawyer representing the First Nations who has been engaged on the case for greater than 20 years.
“If that had been true, then … someday within the ’50s or ’60s, the Authorities of Canada ought to have come to the Anishinaabe and mentioned, ‘My gosh, we will not make a go of it, this is $2 billion, $3 billion, simply take that cash and take the land again, take the waters again,” he mentioned in an interview.
- Obtain the CTV Information app now and get native alerts in your machine
- Get native breaking information and updates despatched to your electronic mail inbox
Ontario has additionally requested in its written submission for the court docket to carry off on a choice till the Supreme Court docket of Canada hears an enchantment on the treaty’s interpretation. That enchantment is scheduled to be heard in November.
In paperwork filed with the Supreme Court docket, Ontario has argued the treaty interpretation might pose vital penalties for its funds and its capacity to steadiness completely different public wants.
A spokesperson for Ontario’s Ministry of Lawyer Common mentioned the province’s enchantment to the Supreme Court docket “will tackle points that stay related between the events in each actions.”
In a quick assertion, a federal spokesperson for Crown-Indigenous Relations mentioned negotiated agreements are most well-liked however the authorities revered the First Nations’ resolution to strive the case.
Closing arguments within the present case are anticipated to wrap this month.
– This report by The Canadian Press was first revealed September 21, 2023.
