‘All in the Family’ Star Carroll O’Connor Feared Too Many People Identified with Archie Bunker

Certain actors seem destined to embody specific roles, leaving an indelible mark on the characters they portray. Sean Connery is James Bond, Tony Randall and Jack Klugman are The Odd Couple, William Shatner is Captain Kirk, and Carroll O’Connor is Archie Bunker. For Norman Lear, the creator of All in the Family, O’Connor was not just a fitting choice for Archie Bunker—he was the very embodiment of the character.

“We didn’t always agree about the scripts,” Lear admitted, “but let me say that I worshipped the ground he walked on. He was Archie Bunker. When I read him for the role, I can’t tell you what I had in mind for that character. All I can tell you is that Carroll O’Connor, the minute he read those lines, that’s who Archie Bunker was.” Lear’s admiration for O’Connor went beyond mere casting; he saw in O’Connor a living representation of Archie, a character who was both a reflection and a critique of American society.

From Stage to Screen

Before stepping into the shoes of Archie Bunker, Carroll O’Connor had a varied career. His acting credits included notable roles in films such as Cleopatra (1963), In Harm’s Way (1965), and Kelly’s Heroes (1970), and guest appearances on TV shows like The Untouchables and Mission: Impossible. His portrayal of Archie was a departure from his previous roles, marking a turning point in his career.

When O’Connor first encountered Archie Bunker, he approached the character with a level of confidence and understanding. He didn’t view Archie as a hero or a well-meaning, albeit gruff, character. Instead, he saw Archie as a “loser,” a product of conservative upbringing and societal conditioning. “People like Archie live all over the country,” O’Connor remarked in 1972. “They may be the largest part of the American middle class. They are conservative, perhaps without understanding why. Many have what I call the ‘fine people rationale’: They believe the fine people are conservative. So conservatism is best; it puts them close to the top.”

The Complexity of Archie Bunker

Despite Archie’s growing popularity, O’Connor remained critical of the character’s appeal. “He’s popular on the tube, because viewers enjoy watching him,” O’Connor observed. “But I don’t believe many of them would have him for a friend or feel they share any of his traits.” Archie was, in O’Connor’s view, a victim of his own education and background—shaped by early exposure to bigotry.

O’Connor’s own experiences with bigotry, although never expressed within his family, were part of the broader societal context. He hoped that even if the show’s audience included individuals with Archie’s prejudiced views, they would recognize the inherent unhappiness within the character. “The Archies of the world look down on all minorities,” O’Connor said, “but some they consider worse than others. But I’m not making Archie lovable. I’m making him a human being, and you can always find some element of love in a human being.”

Public Perception and Legacy

The character of Archie Bunker became so intertwined with O’Connor’s identity that fans began to confuse the actor with his role. “Everybody wants to know if I’m like Archie Bunker in real life,” O’Connor noted in 1971. “Maybe the relationship is too close. The public is beginning to forget Carroll O’Connor and think only of Archie Bunker.” Despite the confusion, O’Connor was clear about the role’s purpose. “We’re kidding. We’re making a fool out of Archie Bunker. And that’s how we’re going to repay his racism,” he explained.

The paradox was evident: while the character of Archie Bunker resonated with a segment of the audience, leading to the very type of bigotry he portrayed, the show also achieved its goal of highlighting and ridiculing such prejudice. “We did make a fool of him,” O’Connor concluded, “and everyone saw him being made a fool of.”

Carroll O’Connor’s portrayal of Archie Bunker remains one of television’s most iconic and complex roles, blending humor with social commentary in a way that continues to provoke thought and discussion decades later.