Carroll O’Connor Thought ‘All in the Family’ Critics Were ‘Hacks and Semi-Literates’

In the realm of television critique, Carroll O’Connor wielded words as sharply as his character Archie Bunker’s tongue. Known for his role in “All in the Family,” O’Connor was not one to mince words when it came to his disdain for TV critics. At a CBS-hosted dinner for industry professionals, O’Connor famously lambasted critics as “jerks,” boldly declaring that many were incompetent in their craft. This wasn’t an isolated incident; O’Connor had previously labeled TV critics as “hacks and semi-literates,” doubling down on his criticism.

“The managing editors of newspapers hire inferior people to write television,” O’Connor asserted, reflecting his blunt approach to those who assessed his work. While he dished out criticisms freely, he admitted that receiving critiques stung, acknowledging the enduring power of a critic’s pen over an artist’s work.

In a hypothetical digital age, one can only imagine the fireworks if O’Connor had access to Twitter. His confrontational style and uncompromising opinions would have likely sparked viral debates and heated exchanges, amplifying his already controversial persona.

Yet, O’Connor’s conflicts extended beyond his public spats with critics. His relationship with Norman Lear, creator of “All in the Family,” was fraught with tension from the outset. O’Connor’s initial reaction to the show’s pilot script was disdainful, prompting him to rewrite it entirely. Surprisingly, Lear acquiesced to O’Connor’s revisions, marking a rare moment of agreement between the two. However, their collaboration soon soured, marked by mutual antipathy and occasional outbursts.

“I was nasty to him on occasions,” O’Connor confessed about his interactions with Lear. Their contentious dynamic persisted over the years, with O’Connor candidly admitting that animosity still lingered between them decades later.

Carroll O’Connor’s legacy as Archie Bunker endures, a testament to his ability to challenge norms and provoke thought through his controversial portrayal. His clashes with critics and collaborators alike underscored a complex personality driven by passion and a relentless pursuit of authenticity in his craft.